Focused Research Organization
Get involved

Research

Five tracks, and a gate.

Year One runs five tracks in parallel. Each has written kill criteria and a named artefact, and every lead position is open. At the fourth-quarter gate we commit to a focus — a decision about where the effort goes, not a contest the others lose.

Year one

Track 02

6–10 contributors

Seeking lead

World Models and JEPA

Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures point past purely generative AI toward sample-efficient learning, grounded reasoning and world models for embodied agents. For a research programme with limited compute, an architecture family whose central claim is sample efficiency is not a fashionable choice — it is the practical one.

Kill criteria. If replication does not reach published baselines within two quarters, the track narrows to the Indic low-resource question only, or closes.

Read the track brief →

Track 04

6–10 contributors

Seeking lead

Tokenomics — Valuing AI Token Usage

As language models become infrastructure, the unit economics of inference remain poorly understood. Pricing, fair use and per-token value attribution are open problems with genuine policy weight — and they are a live blocker on enterprise adoption, which makes them squarely an SME problem.

Kill criteria. If the attribution toolkit cannot reproduce a finance team's own cost model on a real workload, the framework is wrong and the track closes rather than being defended.

Read the track brief →

Track 05

4–8 contributors

Maharashtra AI Policy

Maharashtra is writing AI policy while the industrial base it applies to — Pune's manufacturing and services SMEs — has almost no representation in the drafting. Policy written without that input tends to fund capability that already exists in large firms and misses the constraints an SME actually faces. The window for evidence to be useful is while a document is being drafted, not after it is published.

Kill criteria. If the policy process closes without our submission being read, or the work becomes advocacy without evidence behind it, this closes rather than continuing as a relationship-building exercise. Influence that cannot be pointed at is not a deliverable.

Read the track brief →

The plan

The narrowing is scheduled, not hoped for.

The Year One convergence gate Five tracks run in parallel through Year One, narrow into a single committed mission at the fourth-quarter gate, and that single line thickens through Years Two and Three as output scales from three papers to twenty. Reasoning & game theory World models · JEPA Agentic UX Tokenomics Maharashtra AI policy Q4 gate commit to one mission Year 1 · explore · 3 papers Year 2 · accelerate · 10 Year 3 · scale · 20
Solid — Year 1 scope Dashed — closes at the Q4 gate Weight — output volume

Pipeline

Written up, not started

Briefed, and waiting for someone.

These have a full brief — subthemes, deliverables and kill criteria — and no work behind them yet. They are here rather than above because a track nobody has started is not year-one progress, and counting it as such would flatter the year.

Wider topic pool

Not yet tracks

Live in the pool, waiting on someone.

These came out of member proposals and have not been started. An empty slot with a name on the door recruits better than a full-looking list.

TopicStatusIntended artefact
Compliance for SMEs Open — seeking a lead Possible self-serve product
Datasets for EV, solar and renewable energy Open — seeking a lead Open dataset
Protocols for human–agent collaboration Scoping To be defined
Fraud detection across unstructured documents Scoping Whitepaper and trial MVP

How work moves

Workflow

Including the exit that isn’t a paper.

  1. Proposal sourcing from researchers, industry and members
  2. Initial screening for relevance, novelty and feasibility
  3. Shortlisted ideas become research topics under interim governance
  4. Problem definition, literature review, methodology, initial analysis
  5. Periodic interim reviews on progress and originality
  6. Low originality exits here — redirected to a blog, point of view or whitepaper rather than carried as research
  7. IP disclosure, patentability and prior-art check, filing decision
  8. Commercialisation decision — licence, spin-off, government adoption or sale
  9. Execution, revenue sharing and portfolio maintenance

Step six is the one that matters. Most research programmes have no honest way to stop, so weak work gets carried until it embarrasses someone. Full governance and IP framework →